AI Products & Automation
AI assistants & agents
Chat and task agents grounded in your own documents, systems and rules.
What it is
An AI assistant that answers from your knowledge and acts inside your tools — retrieval-grounded, permission-aware and measurable.
Why businesses need it
Support queues and internal search swallow hours every week. An assistant only earns its cost when it is correct about *your* product, not generically plausible.
What MIWEBX delivers
- Customer-facing support and pre-sales assistants
- Internal knowledge assistants over docs, tickets and wikis
- Task agents that draft, classify, route or update records
- Retrieval-augmented generation over your own corpus
- Human handoff and escalation paths built in, not bolted on
Core features
- Chunking, embedding and retrieval tuned to your document shapes
- Citations back to the source for every answer
- Guardrails: refusal behaviour, topic limits, PII handling
- Tool calling with explicit permissions per agent role
- Conversation quality review loop with graded examples
- Cost and latency budgets tracked per conversation
Technical capabilities
- Model access sits behind one internal interface, so a provider swap is a config change rather than a rewrite
- Retrieval grounding returns the passage the answer came from, so the UI can cite it
- Evaluation harness: a graded question set replayed on every prompt, model or index change
- Refusal and out-of-scope behaviour written as tested cases, not left to a fallback
- Tool calls executed with scoped credentials, separate from the end user's own permissions
- Token and cost budget enforced per conversation, with context trimmed before the request leaves the service
- Request and response logging with personal data redacted and a defined retention window
How we build it
- Find the question or task asked often enough to be worth automating
- Scope which sources the assistant may read and which it may never touch
- Prototype retrieval against real documents before any interface work
- Grade draft answers on a reviewed example set and tighten grounding where they fail
- Wire tool actions with an approval point on anything that writes to a system
- Monitor failures, handoffs and cost per conversation, re-running the eval on each change
Technology stack
- OpenAI APIs
- Anthropic APIs
- Python
- TypeScript
- PostgreSQL + pgvector
- Node.js
- FastAPI
What you receive
- The assistant, deployed with its own environment and keys
- Ingested knowledge base with a documented refresh process
- Evaluation set and scorecard for answer quality
- Guardrail and escalation configuration
- Admin view of conversations, failures and cost
Business benefits
- First-line questions answered without a person in the loop
- Answers consistent across agents instead of per-person
- Institutional knowledge stops living in one employee's head
- Support capacity grows without linear hiring